Verified · Tier 1 Primary
Indexed in the Sardine Protocol library since 2026
Effectiveness and Safety of a Novel Care Model for the Management of Type 2 Diabetes at 1 Year: An Open-Label, Non-Randomized, Controlled Study
Hallberg SJ, McKenzie AL, Williams PT, Bhanpuri NH, Peters AL, Campbell WW, Hazbun TL, Volk BM, McCarter JP, Phinney SD, Volek JS · 2018 · Diabetes Therapy
DOI: 10.1007/s13300-018-0373-9View source ↗
“HbA1c declined from 7.6% to 6.3% in CCI group; UC group showed no significant change.”
Summary
This is the largest published study of sustained nutritional ketosis as a T2D management strategy. The Virta Health study enrolled 349 adults with type-2 diabetes — 262 in the continuous care intervention (CCI, an app-mediated remote-care program with macronutrient guidance toward sustained nutritional ketosis) and 87 in usual care. The design was open-label and non-randomized (participants self-selected into the intervention), so it sits below DiRECT's RCT evidence in the hierarchy — but the sample is larger and the duration is longer. At one year, the intervention group's HbA1c fell from 7.6 to 6.3 percent (the threshold for diabetes remission), mean weight loss was 13.8 kg, and 94 percent of insulin users reduced or eliminated insulin therapy. Sulfonylureas were discontinued completely in the CCI group. Secondary markers improved across the board: HOMA-IR dropped 55 percent, hsCRP dropped 39 percent, triglycerides dropped 24 percent, HDL-C rose 18 percent. The usual-care arm showed no meaningful change on any of these endpoints.
Talking it through with practitioners
The Inner Circle is a paid, async-first community for discussing what new evidence means for actual cycles — opening soon.
Citation graph
How this entry connects to the rest of the library
References cited by this entry
- ExtendsPrimary care-led weight management for remission of type 2 diabetes (DiRECT): an open-label, cluster-randomised trialLean MEJ et al. · 2018
Where DiRECT used a balanced-macronutrient VLCD to drive T2D remission, the Virta program used sustained nutritional ketosis. Both produce similar 1-year glycemic and weight outcomes through different mechanistic levers.
- ExtendsThe effect of a low-carbohydrate, ketogenic diet versus a low-glycemic index diet on glycemic control in type 2 diabetes mellitusWestman EC et al. · 2008
Westman 2008 (24-week LCKD vs LGI in T2D) established the proof of concept; Virta 2018 scaled it to a 1-year continuous-care program with remote monitoring.
Entries that reference this one
- ContradictsMetabolic Impact of Intermittent Fasting in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Interventional StudiesBorgundvaag E et al. · 2021
Virta's sustained nutritional ketosis showed strong HbA1c improvement; this meta-analysis of typical IF protocols (mostly time-restricted eating) showed similar HbA1c outcomes between IF and standard diet. The ketosis depth, not the fasting pattern alone, may be the active variable.
- SupportsThe effect of a low-carbohydrate, ketogenic diet versus a low-glycemic index diet on glycemic control in type 2 diabetes mellitusWestman EC et al. · 2008
Westman 2008 was the proof-of-concept 24-week RCT that supported scaling sustained ketogenic care to the Virta program a decade later.
Tags
Not medical advice. This page summarizes primary research. It is not a substitute for consultation with a qualified clinician. See safety for exclusion criteria.