The Effect of Starting the Protein-Sparing Modified Fast on Weight Change over 5 years
Pfoh ER, Lowenthal G, Jeffers L, Burguera B, Cetin D, Hu B, Gupta NM, Cantave M, Rothberg MB · 2020 · Journal of General Internal Medicine
DOI: 10.1007/s11606-019-05535-0View source ↗
“PSMF patients were more likely to experience ≥5% weight loss at 1 year (55% vs 20%) and 3 years (33% vs 23%), but not 5 years (34% vs 29%).”
Summary
This Cleveland Clinic-affiliated study followed 1,403 patients who were eligible for a protein-sparing modified fast program over 5 years to answer the question the original 1970s PSMF literature could not: does the dramatic short-term weight loss persist? Of those eligible, 879 (63 percent) actually initiated PSMF; the remaining 524 (37 percent) pursued other dietary approaches and served as a comparison cohort. The 1-year outcomes were dramatic and favored PSMF: -7.6 percent body weight in the PSMF arm versus -1.8 percent in the comparison arm, a 5.8-percentage-point difference (p less than 0.01). At 3 years, PSMF still showed an advantage but smaller: -2.3 percent vs -0.9 percent, a 1.4-point difference. By 5 years, the difference had effectively disappeared: -1.4 percent vs -1.0 percent (p=0.64, not statistically significant). The proportion achieving clinically meaningful (≥5 percent) weight loss told the same story: PSMF was strongly favored at 1 and 3 years, equivalent at 5 years. The honest conclusion: PSMF produces substantial short-term weight loss with good durability through year 3, but by year 5 the advantage over conventional dietary care is gone.
Talking it through with practitioners
The free Skool community is where we discuss what new evidence means for actual cycles.
Tags
Not medical advice. This page summarizes primary research. It is not a substitute for consultation with a qualified clinician. See safety for exclusion criteria.