A randomized pilot study comparing zero-calorie alternate-day fasting to daily caloric restriction in adults with obesity

Summary

This randomized pilot study asked the cleanest possible head-to-head question for intermittent fasting: when matched for the goal of weight loss, does alternate-day fasting beat ordinary daily caloric restriction? Adults with obesity (BMI ≥30, age 18–55) were randomized to either zero-calorie alternate-day fasting (ADF, n=14) or moderate daily caloric restriction (CR at -400 kcal/day, n=12) for 8 weeks, followed by 24 weeks of unsupervised follow-up. The ADF arm achieved a substantially larger calculated energy deficit (about 376 kcal/day greater than CR), yet the actual weight loss was statistically indistinguishable: ADF -8.2 kg vs CR -7.1 kg over 8 weeks. Body composition, lipids, and insulin sensitivity index showed no significant between-group differences. Safety was strong — no adverse effects, 93 percent completion in the ADF arm. Twenty-four-week unsupervised follow-up showed similar weight regain in both groups, but the ADF arm trended toward more favorable lean-mass preservation. The honest conclusion: ADF is a safe and tolerable alternative to daily restriction with equivalent short-term outcomes, not a superior intervention.