Low carbohydrate, high fat diet impairs exercise economy and negates the performance benefit from intensified training in elite race walkers

Summary

This Australian Institute of Sport study is the most prominent counter-evidence to keto-adapted athletic performance claims. Burke and colleagues randomized 29 elite race walkers to one of three 3-week dietary conditions during intensified training: continuously high carbohydrate availability (HCHO), periodized carbohydrate availability (PCHO — same total intake but timed around training), or low-carbohydrate high-fat (LCHF — under 50 g/day carbs, 78 percent of energy from fat). All three diets were isocaloric. The findings cut against simple "keto is good for endurance" narratives. Peak aerobic capacity (VO2max) improved across all three diets. But race-walking economy — the oxygen cost per unit speed at race-relevant velocities — got worse on LCHF. The keto-adapted walkers needed more oxygen to walk at the same pace, even with elevated fat oxidation. Net result: 10 km race time did not improve on LCHF (about -1.6 percent change, not statistically meaningful) while both carbohydrate-available groups improved 5–7 percent. The conclusion was unambiguous: for elite endurance athletes performing at race-relevant intensities, LCHF impaired performance despite increasing fat oxidation. The paper has been replicated by the same group with different cohorts.